Political leanings

[stonefre]

That skinny-legged bitch Coulter has never had an original thought. She is all about trying to stir things up so she can sell books. I don't really get how anyone could think she is sexy. To each his own I guess.

[alan1chef]

Maybe Obama will get lucky like Clinton and have economic recovery fall in his lap with little or no substantial effort on his part. There is no way he will get re-elected without economic recovery. Hopefully he will stop sticking his foot in his mouth and get something positive accomplished.

You're right ...political pundits on both sides of the aisle are parading around, talking smack and trying to sell books. Just wait a few months and all those books will be available at your local dollar store for only a buck...because that's all they are worth.

Funny story smuttley, pointless, but funny, and your interpretation of the english language is hilarious,"alan1"dickneverwillbechief"....and "neocon"....LOL. So if you want to parade around and be a badass liberal...go for it...make your day. It's pointless.  

You should also know by now that I am not some bornagain rightwing stereotype. If that were the case, I sure wouldn't be here, would I? Where does it say that you have to be a liberal to love ladyboys?

[blonde_havoc]

(smuttleydfs @ Jul. 29 2009,00:52) ...the arrogant little pissant had the audacity to tell me to shut up...........well being the passive liberal hippie that I be I tucked my tail between my legs and cried............nah.........I asked the right wing puke politely to come here and shut me up......when he cowered and failed to comply.....I approached him nose to nose and again asked him politely again to please shut me up..........when the neocon retreated to his fellow "christians" I spat on the ground and said......8 more years motherfuckers!!!!!!!!!!  


So alan1"dickneverwillbechief your days are not numbered any longer..........they are long gone..........

I bet you're a blast at parties.

[smuttleydfs]

(alan1chef @ Jul. 29 2009,01:44) Maybe Obama will get lucky like Clinton and have economic recovery fall in his lap with little or no substantial effort on his part. There is no way he will get re-elected without economic recovery. Hopefully he will stop sticking his foot in his mouth and get something positive accomplished.  

You're right ...political pundits on both sides of the aisle are parading around, talking smack and trying to sell books. Just wait a few months and all those books will be available at your local dollar store for only a buck...because that's all they are worth.  

Funny story smuttley, pointless, but funny, and your interpretation of the english language is hilarious,"alan1"dickneverwillbechief"....and "neocon"....LOL. So if you want to parade around and be a badass liberal...go for it...make your day. It's pointless.  

You should also know by now that I am not some bornagain rightwing stereotype. If that were the case, I sure wouldn't be here, would I? Where does it say that you have to be a liberal to love ladyboys?

Oh Okay......wannabe chief...........So Clinton had an economic recovery fall in his lap? First I've heard that one.....I guess W had multi trillion dollar deficit fly out of his ass too then huh?

If you agree that the political pundits are all just blowing smoke up our asses to sell books then why do you continue to quote and worship them??? It just proves that most republicans are mindless sheep that can be dragged around by their snouts with no objections........

The point of story wannabe chief is as much as you and your fellow neocons want to believe that all liberals are little wimps afraid to back up their beliefs those days are long gone. But of course this went right over your pointed little head

And the last point is that if you were to reveal your sexual preferences to your right wing com padres you would be ridiculed and likely ostracized so feel free to slide over to the dark side and we will make you an honorary chief!!!!

[f0xxee]

Hi Alan,

I have ignored your posts for a while now due to an exceptional degree of contentment in my life and deep seated need to keep it unsullied by morons.

I have however had a hard morning at work (you know, that thing that keeps us poor, non-business owning,non-Hi-so hobnobbing trash busy during the week) and as I it would be ungracious of me to take a national from the country in which I work and turn him inside out til he resembled a puppy chewed slipper, I have decided to take it out on you.

Because Alan, you are a dick head.

Clinton inhereted good times for sure. And you know what big Al? He passed them onto G W B. Great big surplus. Let the good times roll!

And then you had 9/11 and the majority of the world was sympathetic to the plight of you good chaps in the USA with your 18stone of lard shoveled into 2 oz's of lycra.

And your President, YOUR guy GW managed to start wars on two seperate fronts (ask Hitler, the Kaiser, etc etc how well that works) managed to turn a surplus into the biggest debt ever seen, managed to turn massive world wide sympathy into first indifference and then anger, managed to preside over the greatest corporate malfesance the world has ever seen, starting with Enron, finishing with AIG Bears-Stean and all stations in between....

And you still wear your ingnorance so proudly on your sleave.

I congratulate you. Your hide is as thick as your head.

Have a nice day!

[smuttleydfs]

[alan1chef]

It is so much fun to watch you guys come unglued over a couple of Rush interviews and Coulter videos. Foxee, looks like you made Smuttleys day....he did not even dispute what you said about Clinton. As for GW, I have never defended his handling of the economy or Iraq...I am glad he was there during 9/11 and not Gore and I am glad we went to Iraq and kicked Saddam's butt. Unfortunately, those are about the only highlights of GW's presidency.

As for me personally...you took something out of context and turned it into something that fit your argument at the time, however, I need to set the record straight. I work 50 hours a week...for somebody else...not myself...that was in the past prior to 9/11. As for Smuttley calling me "burgerflipper" and "chief"...I guess there's not much to do in Michigan these days...so have your fun.

Smuttley, calling the Demos wimps has nothing to do with their physical prowess...it's because they tend to whine and whine when the Republicans are in power but when they have the power, like now...they are clueless...without any idea at all about how to fix things...they wimp out. Obama is heading in that direction and he better get his head out of his ass and quick. What we need is another leader like this.....

[Lefty]

Alan sweety, I think the #1 question on most people's minds is whether you beat off while watching Ann Coulter every time, or just some of the time?

[strocube]

No dude, I think he spanks it while watching Raygun deliver his pathetic corporate drivel.
Reagan was a MAJOR PIECE OF SHIT and corporate shill. He deregulated the savings and loan industry, which in turn led directly to a serious economic melt down. He closed down state run mental hospitals, leading to seriously ill people living on the streets of our cities. Fuck, Iran/ contra, the arming, funding and training of the Mujahadine, which eventually morphed into the Taliban. CIA death squads all over central America.
The star wars program, which never worked then, and still doesn't work today.
He is in no way responsible for "winning" the cold war. The Soviets collapsed under the weight of their own incompetence, and lest we forget, the brain dead actor suggested that catsup was a vegetable. I think we know who the vegetable was.

[smuttleydfs]

Wannabechief once again you just plain don't get it.....much like your fellow neocons. No one is getting upset over oxycotin rush and anorexic ann they basically just ignore them.........I didn't ignore foxee's comments on Clinton I happen to agree with him and point in fact he not only inherited a little bit from GW ( who I happened to have supported and voted for twice) but he actually expounded on it and increased it to the most balanced budget in history.

As for your hero W "kicking" saddam's ass.....hell sarah palin and he alaskan national guard could have done that!!!! The point was the timing behind his invasion and the reasoning behind it were the idiotic flaws. Thats why Osama is still running around free and there are thousands upon thousands of casualties on both sides needlessly!!!!

As far as nothing to do in Michigan again we can thank your hero W for that

[Lefty]

(strocube @ Jul. 31 2009,05:47) No dude, I think he spanks it while watching Raygun deliver his pathetic corporate drivel.
Reagan was a MAJOR PIECE OF SHIT and corporate shill. He deregulated the savings and loan industry, which in turn led directly to a serious economic melt down. He closed down state run mental hospitals, leading to seriously ill people living on the streets of our cities. Fuck, Iran/ contra, the arming, funding and training of the Mujahadine, which eventually morphed into the Taliban. CIA death squads all over central America.
The star wars program, which never worked then, and still doesn't work today.
He is in no way responsible for "winning" the cold war. The Soviets collapsed under the weight of their own incompetence, and lest we forget, the brain dead actor suggested that catsup was a vegetable. I think we know who the vegetable was.

Strocube, you rock man.    

Excellent post. You cover all the things about Bedtime For Bonzo that Allypoo chooses to forget or ignore.  I know watching Ronny Reagan gives Alan's hero Hannity a woody, so it would be no surprise that Alan spanks the monkey while watching some old Ronny speech.

If you get over to Pattaya, I'd be honored to buy you a drink.    

[alan1chef]

IS U.S. NEOCONSERVATISM DEAD?


Grant Havers, Ph.D*
Mark Wexler, Ph.D**

Abstract

It is now fashionable for conventional wisdom to write the obituary for neoconservatism. It is also fashionable to align the movement with a laissez-faire approach to capitalism. Both of these assumptions are highly questionable, since they ignore what has been primary and enduring to neoconservatism, the survival of traditional culture against the challenges of liberalism and the left. Neoconservatism entered the scene as a political and intellectual force in the 1960s and 1970s, combatting the New Left and exposing the contradictions of Great Society liberalism, while aligning itself with the Republican Party. The movement enjoyed considerable influence during the Reagan hegemony of the 1980s, but the exhaustive effects of the culture wars of that time as well as divisions within the GOP arguably left the movement adrift by the 1990s, when the White House returned to the Democrats. Despite some political successes in Congress during the 1990s (and the slim victory of 2000), it has been so far unable to return to past glory. Yet the prospect of a new cultural crisis, spurred on by globalization, might breathe new life into the movement........

http://www.lsus.edu/la/journals/ideo...nservatism.htm

We ain't dead yet...

[alan1chef]

"The boom '90's was a result of Reagan's responsible deregulation in the '80's ......."  ....a discussion about the economy with Larry Summers and Robert Rubin as aired on the Charlie Rose show....

http://video.google.com/googleplayer...A3254000&hl=en" style="width:400px;height:326px" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">



......I'm not the only one giving Reagan credit for laying the foundation for the boom of the 90's....

....and you liberal whiners are at it again...calling me childish names....I was hoping for a more adult discussion...

[Torurot]

Looks like you Left/Right guys are getting a bit heated

Whatever Happened to the GAO?
Pentagon Pundits Get a Pass
http://counterpunch.org/farsetta07302009.html
By DIANE FARSETTA July 30, 2009

Is there a difference between covert propaganda and secretive campaigns to shape public opinion on controversial issues? The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) apparently thinks that there is. .........

[strocube]

(alan1chef @ Jul. 31 2009,14:43) "The boom '90's was a result of Reagan's responsible deregulation in the '80's ......."  ....a discussion about the economy with Larry Summers and Robert Rubin as aired on the Charlie Rose show....

http://video.google.com/googleplayer...A3254000&hl=en" style="width:400px;height:326px" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">



......I'm not the only one giving Reagan credit for laying the foundation for the boom of the 90's....

....and you liberal whiners are at it again...calling me childish names....I was hoping for a more adult discussion...

The New Deal, which included such nefarious Bolshevik programs such as social security, public works to improve infrastructure, tighter controls on Wall Street and few concessions to organized labor were all deliberately attacked by Reagan and his corporate henchmen.
The reason those New Deal policies were put in place was to mitigate some of the worst ravages of capitalism--boom-bust cycles, overproduction, rampant unemployment, bank failures etc. FDR effectively saved capitalism from itself in the U.S.
We've recently seen the consequences of the much ballyhooed unfettered capitalism and the dismantling of the New Deal in action--global economic melt-down.


I'd also like to add that conservatives have been WRONG about pretty much every major social issue going all the way back to the time of William Blake's "dark satanic mills" during the industrial revolution in Europe.
Conservatives have opposed:
The eight hour work day
The five day work week
Child labor laws
Women's rights
Minority rights
Minimum wage
Paid sick leave
The end to slavery
National health
Food safety laws
Environmental controls on industry
And the list goes on and on.

Rivers of blood were spilled over these things, and every time the conservatives have predicted the end of civilization as we know it should something as egregious and burdensome as say, child labor laws were put in place.
In the words of Hunter S. Thompson, "I piss down the throats of these Nazis."