LADYBOY.REVIEWS
This site contains Adult Content.
Are you at least 18 years old?

Yes No

Lita's Bar: Karl's Birthday & Fantasy Competition

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigkev
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2004
    • 116

    #16
    I also doubt it.....but as an asthmatic,any time i spend in a smoke filled bar or club will be very limited. one day.....probably not in my lifetime,operators may realize the longer patrons stay ,the more they spend,and the better the environment,the more often they return. not my cash flow that's affected....saves me money.

    Comment

    • katoeylover
      Legendary Member
      • Jul 2004
      • 5821

      #17
      (bigkev @ Nov. 06 2007,23:40) I also doubt it.....but as an asthmatic,any time i spend in a smoke filled bar or club will be very limited. one day.....probably not in my lifetime,operators may realize the longer patrons stay ,the more they spend,and the better the environment,the more often they return. not my cash flow that's affected....saves me money.
      I realise your problem, but the same can be said by smokers. If we cant smoke,we spend less time in the bars etc,as they are finding out with the ban in the UK,especially in night clubs.

      As Karl smokes, i dont think it will be happening soon.
      seriously pig headed,arrogant,double standard smart ass poster!

      Comment

      • Ozzie
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 461

        #18
        (katoeylover @ Nov. 07 2007,09:09)
        (bigkev @ Nov. 06 2007,23:40) I also doubt it.....but as an asthmatic,any time i spend in a smoke filled bar or club will be very limited. one day.....probably not in my lifetime,operators may realize the longer patrons stay ,the more they spend,and the better the environment,the more often they return. not my cash flow that's affected....saves me money.
        I realise your problem, but the same can be said by smokers. If we cant smoke,we spend less time in the bars etc,as they are finding out with the ban in the UK,especially in night clubs.

        As Karl smokes, i dont think it will be happening soon.
        To be honest it is not really the patrons I am concerned about as they make a concious decision to enter a bar knowing smoking is allowed, It is more the workers in the bar that have the best argument for non smoking in the bar as most really have no choice but as they may not have any other job available to them For that reason alone I think bars should be non smoking.

        Comment

        • stogie bear
          Legendary Member
          • Jul 2003
          • 16145

          #19
          as most really have no choice but as they may not have any other job available to them...
          This is a joke, right?

          Comment

          • Ozzie
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 461

            #20
            (stogie bear @ Nov. 07 2007,11:24)
            as most really have no choice but as they may not have any other job available to them...
            This is a joke, right? *
            Nope no joke at all. So should the workplace not be a safe environment for an employee? Passive smoking in effect is no different to not having scaffolding on a construction site or not being provided a mask when spray painting.

            Many bar people do not have any other skills to be able to have the luxury of choosing any job.

            It is only mildly inconvenient to ask a smoker to go outside but it makes a world of difference to the health of the employees. I worked as a bar manager for a few years and I developed chronic bronchitis during that time. After I left it was miraculously cured.

            Also no evidence to suggest patronage and therefore revenue has gone down in fact the people who I talk to who work in this industry that I worked with years ago tell me the opposite is in fact true.

            Comment

            • stogie bear
              Legendary Member
              • Jul 2003
              • 16145

              #21
              who I talk to who work in this industry that I worked with years ago tell me the opposite is in fact true...
              I agree with this. Common sense will tell you that if the small amount of smokers are left outside then the majority of customers who don't smoke would be more inclined to visit, stay longer and probably pop by more often.

              The scaffolding analogy doesn't work as scaffolding in Thailand is bamboo shoots and string. NOT like where YOUR home town is.

              Many bar people do not have any other skills to be able to have the luxury of choosing any job...
              Most people do not have the skills to be able to choose "any job." I wish I was the CEO of Microsoft! Most Thai ladyboy hookers are of above average intelligence and could easily do most jobs that most Thais do.

              Obviously the best paying jobs require the most sacrifice. Maybe they could work in Chinese coal pits?

              Comment

              • Ozzie
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2008
                • 461

                #22
                I am talking about what should happen not what does happen.

                As far as choosing any job let me put this another way. Some people might say if they don't like working in smokey places then find another job but why should they? I believe everyone deserves to work in an safe workplace.

                So if banning smoking makes it a safer workplace for the employees and generally improves the bottom line then why not do it?

                Comment

                • Torurot
                  Moderator
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 2915

                  #23
                  " I believe everyone deserves to work in an safe workplace."

                  Right with you on this one Ozzie. Bar owners should provide free Lube & condoms. They KNOW why their staff are being Bar fined. Casanova bar for a short time had a smoke free house.

                  Comment

                  Working...