If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I hadn't actually considered it until I read Azza's post.
It does make sense. After the Aussies batting collapse on the first day, the odds being quoted for an Australia victory must have been tempting.
And given Pakistan's record of throwing matches, this one would only be another step towards the players retirement fund.
The one Australian batsman who kept them in the game, Mike Hussey was dropped 3 times!!! Then Pakistan captain Mohammad Yousuf gave his wicket away when they were within 99 runs of victory.
And of course, in the midst of all the triumphalism shown by the Australian side & the Australian media, no one wants to go looking too hard for any questionable bets being laid.
I think there has to be a 50% chance that there was more than skill that determined the result of this test match.
Despite the high cost of living, it continues to be popular.
The Test Result was due to an overdose of good luck going Australia,s wayand a fair smattering of incompetence on bekalf of yhe visitors no match fixing crap!!!
(richmond @ Jan. 08 2010,10:40) The Test Result was due to an overdose of good luck going Australia's way and a fair smattering of incompetence on behalf of the visitors no match fixing crap!!!
Yes, you are correct - how foolish of me - Pakis would never do such a dastardly thing
Comment