LADYBOY.REVIEWS
This site contains Adult Content.
Are you at least 18 years old?

Yes No

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The crime of lèse-majesté...

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The crime of lèse-majesté...

    The Times news article is here...

    An Australian novelist was jailed for three years by a Bangkok court on Monday, the latest in a growing number of Thais and foreigners prosecuted for the crime of €œinsulting€ the family of King Bhumibol Adulyadej.

    Harry Nicolaides, a 41-year old teacher and part time writer was convicted on the basis of a 103 word paragraph about the alleged sexual peccadilloes of the royal family, particularly Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn.

    He could have received a sentence of as much as twelve years and his decision to reverse an earlier plea of not guilty persuaded the judge to hand down the minimum sentence possible for the crime of lèse-majesté, or insulting the monarchy...
    I understand that these laws exist but the prosecution of them seem a bit heavy handed to me.

    This thread is to discus the law and it's enactment and NOT the Thai Monarch...

    Below are some comments from The Times website...

    Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with Thailand's less majeste laws they do exist. Anyone involved in publishing is acutely aware of what is and isn't allowed. The author himself admitted he was aware but I cannot understand how he could have thought the laws didn't apply in his case?

    Andrew, Bangkok, Thailand

    It seems the government doesn't like it when their King is offended or disrespected (which is fair enough but maybe the punishment's a little harsh) but like the article states, how ironic that the King disagrees with that particular law himself. Surely Mr. Nicolaides will be released shortly.

    Tom, Sydney, Australia

    Have spent quite a bit of time in Thailand, and knowing the Thai people love their king, I am still quite disturbed to learn of Nicolaides fate and even the existence of such a law. For a country that lives on westerners tourism this is a foolish move. I for one will not spend another dime there.

    Bob Cauley, New York, USA

    He knew the law but he ignored it. He was a lecturer, He could have published his book when he left Thailand. I've been in Singapore many times, i couldn't chew a gum and i didn't because I respect the law in Singapore. learn culture before saying anything.

    Pimm S., Bangkok, Thailand

    Every country around the world has its own laws and customs so it's probably better to play with caution whilst in that country and not risk being arrested for anything but I hope Harry is pardoned as soon as possible. Murderers have been given lighter sentences than that. Freedom of speech rules!

    Donna, Kos, Greece

    "lese majeste" laws - I would recommend U.N. sanctions, that tourist groups recommend none of their clientele visit this country, IMF cut off any funding, and then the embassys request unconditional releases. Finally, these offenders need to apologize - they were impolite guests.

    Jeff Dunham, Yacolt, USA

    It is wrong that a Western author feels that he has the right to comment on the royal family of Thailand and to attack a system that has been in place for hundreds of years. Westerners need to step back and think before comparing their ideals to Asian ones. Nicolaides, I feel you got off lucky.

    Anna, Tauranga, New Zealand

    He lived in the country for 2 years...he was well aware of the lese majeste law. I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Thailand for 2 years and we were all well aware of the law and the enormous respect the Thai people have for their King within days of arriving in the country.

    Jeffrey, PetoskeyUSA,

    Hard to believe he did not see this coming. You simply do not bring up the monarchy at all in Thailand if you are not Thai, even in normal conversation. Any Thai can lodge a heresay complaint against you at any time, you have to be this careful.

    Dan, Glendale,

    There is no way that this guy could have worked in Thailand and not known how serious it is to insult the king, let alone put it in print. The king, himself, actually says he is not above criticism and will probably pardon him within a month.

    Lee, Kyiv, Ukraine

    Why would someone think that the laws of the land don't apply to you, when you are in that country? I feel for Nicolaides, but it was arrogant to behave as such. He could've published his book once he left the country. This is a tragedy that needn't have happened.

    elisabeth, seattle, usa

    It is their right to have their own laws. It is our right to cut off all financial connections they have with our countries.

    Robert, Halifax, Canada

    It is a disgrace to say we have no right to "judge" the Thai legal system. We have every right! Individual rights are universal and inalienable. I do hope Mr. Nicolaides, when he is released, publishes his book outside Thailand and makes a bundle doing so.

    Frode Odegard, San Diego, USA

    this is ridiculous....where is the free speech? where is Australia coming to their countryman's defense? CNN wont even say what he wrote for fear of the Thailand laws.... and people wonder why there's so much fighting in the world.... take the criticism the year is 2009 get over it...

    Brian, chicago, USA

    A country with medieval juridical system doesn't deserve to have any support from nations that support freedom of speech. Why not boycott Thailand, only money is a true weapon to fight such insane behaviour.

    Jean Luc, Antwerp, Belgium

    The Aussie Government must act quickly and get the author released through diplomatic negotiations. The book has not been sold in millions of copies, people don't know even know what was written in those three lines. It is surely too much for the author to endure.

    Vamsi, Atlanta, USA

    3 years for insulting royalty in a foreign country with a reasonable chance of being pardoned? I'd say the guy got off lucky. I learned within 3 days of my 1st visit that insulting the king was an offense. And his next book will probably sell more copies -outside of Thailand...

    David, Orange,

    I totally agree with Matt. He should not have been so arrogant as to believe that Thai laws would not apply to him in Thailand.

    Norm, Las Vegas, USA

    Totally outrageous. Send him on the next plane home. He has already spent four months in jail. I'm sure he won't do it again. The really are despicable peasants.

    james, Melbourne,

    This is an outrage and an insult. I'm all for respecting cultural differences, but someone needs to have the audacity to stand up to laws and judgements that spit on basic human rights. What happened to freedom of speach? And three years is an insane punishment, let alone in a Thai prison.

    George, Galway, Ireland

    We have no right to judge the Thai legal system It may not suit us or be in accordance with the meme of European morals but they are not imposing it here. He knew the law.
    Likewise, we should not accept that foreigners coming to Europe impose their will or "special needs" becasue of their culture.

    matt, antibes, France




    (Apologies to SamplerDoc... I didn't realize you had posted before on this topic...)
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Harsh but it is just a reminder to all that you should ALWAYS respect the laws of the country you are currently in.


    Azza


    A worthy trip report

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't want to start the religious hate debate again but the reaction from the BMs here was quite different when the teacher insulted a prophet. That was also about knowing the law and culture.

      Comment


      • #4
        (azza33 @ Jan. 20 2009,15:36) Harsh but it is just a reminder to all that you should ALWAYS respect the laws of the country you are currently in.
        And a reminder to all that are living in or visiting Thailand
        that things in the Land Behind the Smiles are not what they seem.
        They enforce laws and apply rules at random.

        Some tourists think that walking around without shirts and performing lewd acts in public is normal here.
        Agreed -it is tolerated at certain places (and as long as they can make some money....)
        Lost in Space!

        Comment


        • #5
          (Master Bator @ Jan. 20 2009,15:55)
          (azza33 @ Jan. 20 2009,15:36) Harsh but it is just a reminder to all that you should ALWAYS respect the laws of the country you are currently in.
          And a reminder to all that are living in or visiting Thailand
          that things in the Land Behind the Smiles are not what they seem.
          They enforce laws and apply rules at random.

          Some tourists think that walking around without shirts and performing lewd acts in public is normal here.
          Agreed -it is tolerated at certain places (and as long as they can make some money....)
          Agree totally and read this earlier in the Bangkok post in disbelief...

          Alot of the shirts off brigade are 2 week millionares and have the IQ of a flip flop so there behaviour is almost expected ... but this guy was educated....

          Still a nightmare in anyones book....good luck to him

          Comment


          • #6
            I loved the comments on justice from those living in a country that has incarcerated people for up to 7 years without trial.
            I couldn't give a shit how long it is until you're next holiday- I live here

            Comment


            • #7
              The fact they jailed this guy is a political move nothing less .
              It shows the paranoia that exists , the guy only sold seven books  
              Free your mind and your ass will follow .

              Comment


              • #8
                (robbo @ Jan. 20 2009,19:23) we have to pay thru the nose for it to the tune of £60/70 million plus a year.
                I always fall about laughing when I see this old chestnut rolled out!    

                Anyone want to tell me what it costs to run the President of Ireland?          

                Anyone want to tell me who the President of Ireland is?      

                Anyone want to tell me how many tourists each year go to Ireland to see the President and/or visit where he (or is it she?) lives?    


                Don't worry if you can't answer these questions.    


                It costs more to run the President of Ireland than it does to run the Queeen of the United Kingdom.
                Even some of the people of Ireland cannot name their own President and yet they can name the Queen of the United Kingdom.
                (Incidentally the current President of Ireland is Mary McAleese who is probably the most popular person to occupy the position since it was created in 1921).
                I can't answer the last question other than to say that it's very few compared to those who go to see Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Sandringham, Balmoral etc let alone the Queen herself.



                Now to get to the real argument  -  do some real research into the alternative forms of government and then come back and try to convert me to a system other than a constitutional monarchy.


                I'll give you some clues:-    
                The most efficient form of government is a dictatorship.
                The cheapest is anarchy  -  my favourite but it has a few flaws.  Look it up properly before you comment!
                The most popular is a republic  -  but I don't know why as it's the easiest to corrupt and is hopelessly inefficient.  (Anyone remember some bloke called George W. Something?)
                Despotism is popular in Africa  -  Zimbabwe is a good example.   Autocracy  -  sort of like Zimbabwe.   Oligarchy  -  sort of like this forum.

                At the end of the day there is a reason why constitutional monarchy works in many countries even today.
                It's hard to corrupt  -  politically.  Though it does depend greatly on the quality of the monarch.
                It's cheap  -  yes  I did say it's cheap!
                It provides stability and continuity  -  these are boring but necessary  -  unless you like anarchy.


                Now back to the subject.   The simple fact is that this law exists in Thailand  -  and despite one of the comments in the original post it's not a medieval law but is in fact a very modern one.
                Even if the King  -  or the law courts  -  do not agree with it  -  it's the law of the land and the law courts here do apply the law with a high degree of impartiality.
                The choices are either to comply with the law  -  break it and face the consequences   -  or attempt to change it.

                RR.


                PS.  berfore our Irish friends comment  -  I could use any example  -  but this is the only one I have information on.   Besides I'm 1/16th Irish myself!
                Pedants rule, OK. Or more precisely, exhibit certain of the conventional trappings of leadership.

                "I love the smell of ladyboy in the morning."
                Kahuna

                Comment


                • #9
                  (Road Runner @ Jan. 21 2009,02:43) PS.  berfore our Irish friends comment  -  I could use any example  -  but this is the only one I have information on.   Besides I'm 1/16th Irish myself!    
                  So you have a bit of Irish in you RR.

                  Is it Bigmick?
                  A friend in need is a f**king pest

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    (ciobha @ Jan. 21 2009,05:27) Is it Bigmick?  
                    Nah i don't think RR would let big mick shag him
                    i'm going where the sun keeps shining.................

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      (Stogie @ Jan. 20 2009,12:16) This thread is to discus the law and it's enactment and NOT the Thai Monarch...
                      Please refrain from comments concerning the Monarchy
                      "Snick, You Sperm Too Much" - Anon

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I agree.  Even this thread is on thin ice, by reporting adverse quotes. The Thai Authorities are looking more critically at this on the internet in LOS, than on porn sites.

                        But then I'm always too cautious in life ....  
                        TT

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I read an excellent article today from the Ambassador of Thailand which explained the purpose of the law.

                          The King of Thailand represents the heart of the Nation and must never been seen to give his personal opinion and openly critise. That is the his restriction for being King.

                          The laws are in place to protect him and as he cannot openly protect himself.
                          Anthonymustang

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            (azza33 @ Jan. 20 2009,15:36) Harsh but it is just a reminder to all that you should ALWAYS respect the laws of the country you are currently in.
                            does this apply to muslims coming to weston countrys?
                            just a sex tourist looking for hot fun

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              (Anthony_Mustang @ Jan. 21 2009,12:51) I read an excellent article today from the Ambassador of Thailand which explained the purpose of the law.

                              The King of Thailand represents the heart of the Nation  and must never been seen to give his personal opinion and openly critise. That is the his restriction for being King.

                              The laws are in place to protect him and as he cannot openly protect himself.
                              Good Lord, surely you're not saying that you're actually swallowing that kind of moronic pap, are you, let alone telling us that we should?

                              The sole purpose of the lese majeste law is to keep the peasants in line and kill stone dead any possibility of even the appearance of dissent in this country. It works. While ripping apart the leaders of ever western democracy on earth (except maybe for Blank Check Obama, everybody's flavor of the month) CNN and BBC refuse even to report the alleged statements that have lead to arrests and prosecutions for lese majeste for fear of offending Thailand. They should be ashamed of themselves.

                              Imprisoning people for what they think and what they say is primitive and barbaric, and the royalists will continue to use lese majeste as a weapon to silence all opposition as long as people are afraid. And so many of the posters here say we must silently respect and accept this kind of outrage because it is the law Thailand? Shame on all of you.

                              Comment



                              Working...
                              X