Some useless but fun facts!

[Tomcat]

(kahuna @ Oct. 26 2009,20:47) speculated that the Germans landed on the Moon as early as 1942.  

Thats the key word for the conspiracy nuts... speculation...

No evidence is ever produced yet these Nuts have magazines every month about UFO abductions , Elvis sightings and Big Foot/Yeti hunters

Every two years we have the Loch Ness Monster thing rear its head.. some clown throws his pet snake in the drink and takes a few photos. The next week hundreds of guys with anoraks turn up with flasks and sandwiches in situ....

Of course hard evidence is never produced... dream on...

[manarak]

speaking about conspiracies...

this is not a speculation.
ask yourself the question of how much of their own loyal citizens the USA agree(d?) to kill for political motives.
once you found your answer, do an internet search for "operation northwoods"

[kahuna]

What a bunch of fucking hogwash...

The only real conspiracy around here is one of dunces...

[Guest]

(JaiDee @ Oct. 26 2009,18:31) OK, you guys have  convinced me!  

  AND HERE'S THE PROOF!!;          

 Damn,  too bad Teddy Kennedy  didn't read on The Ladyboy Forums before his demise, he could have gotten The Truth!!

Well jd,i must admit,i didnt think you would waver in your stance,i applaud you in your willingness to admit "maybe ,just maybe there is something in it.."(correct me if i'm wrong) I think Ted Kennedy knew a lot more than he let on,but of course he was a "realpolitik" politician,and he couldnt exactly make any sort of fuss,especially after Chappaquiddick,and the double assasinations of his brothers..Perhaps RFK would have revealed the truth,as he was undoubtedly to become the democratic nominee for the next election,and due to his popularity ,and the wave of sympathy for the Kennedy clan,an absolute shoe-in for the next president instead of Nixon.Coincidentally,guess where tricky Dicky was the morning of kennedys assasination?Why,flying out of Dallas airport of course.Ive enjoyed the debate.....cheers,travis

[Guest]

(pacman @ Oct. 26 2009,20:38)    Get back here ya coward...      

I think the topic has run its course & we can call it a draw.   post)

draw my arse-battered to death by pacman's list

[Naang Faa]

(JaiDee @ Oct. 25 2009,15:35)

(pacman @ Oct. 24 2009,22:28) How about this one - what was Oswald's motive for killing the President?

To become famous, plain and simple.

Only fits if he admitted it .... he said he was a patsy and never confessed
to the crime..

OK afrer litrally minutes pondering over this,over a bottle of wine with my mate Mike..we come to the conclusion that perhaps Jackie O fired the final shot...
Goes something like this..
Some one shoots him in the back from behind (Oswald or someone from the Daltex building not fussed o this point)
While hes debilitated Jackie (who is paying too much attention to Gov Whatshischops) gets the "do it" order from him..
She puts her hand on the back of his neck pushes him forward and shoots him upwards through his throat,causing that white gunsmoke you see on impact...The reason she jumps out on to the back of the limo is not to recover a piece of brain as reported but to collect the bullet cartridge..
She refused to change her clothes-even wore the same blood splattered suit on the flight back to
Washington-so no forensic evidence ca be used (i'e gunpowder residue)
And it is a bit suspicious that the frames of the Zapruder film goes a bit iffy at the bottom where her hand actions are concealed..Look at the film,it makes as good a yarn as anyther theory.

Motive- He was a cheat and a womaniser..
Time of the month..

Case closed

x

[JaiDee]

(pacman @ Oct. 26 2009,20:38) I think the topic has run its course & we can call it a draw.  

Agreed, and thanks to all for their well-thought-out posts and especially NF for her comical last post....or were ye serious??  

   good to see we can all have fun, spirited debates like this one without anyone getting reamed TOO much  ......and as Oz said early on and now pacman regarding all this whole JFK deal, we will all just have to agree to disagree on many aspects of it.