LADYBOY.REVIEWS
This site contains Adult Content.
Are you at least 18 years old?

Yes No

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AIDS Vaccine

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AIDS Vaccine

    Associated Press
    BANGKOK -- For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scientists to think such a vaccine might never be possible.

    The vaccine cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by more than 31% in the world's largest AIDS vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok.

    Even though the benefit is modest, "it's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine," Col. Jerome Kim said in a telephone interview. He helped lead the study for the U.S. Army, which sponsored it with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

    The institute's director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned that this is "not the end of the road," but said he was surprised and very pleased by the outcome.

    "It gives me cautious optimism about the possibility of improving this result" and developing a more effective AIDS vaccine, Dr. Fauci said in a telephone interview. "This is something that we can do."

    Even a marginally helpful vaccine could have a big impact. Every day, 7,500 people world-wide are newly infected with HIV and two million died of AIDS in 2007, the U.N. agency UNAIDS estimates.

    "Today marks an historic milestone," said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, an international group that has worked toward developing a vaccine.

    "It will take time and resources to fully analyze and understand the data, but there is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field," he said in a statement.

    The Thailand Ministry of Public Health conducted the study, which used strains of HIV common in Thailand. Whether such a vaccine would work against other strains in the U.S., Africa or elsewhere in the world is unknown, scientists stressed.

    The study actually tested a two-vaccine combo in a "prime-boost" approach, where the first one primes the immune system to attack HIV and the second one strengthens the response.

    They are ALVAC, from Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of French drug maker Sanofi-Aventis; and AIDSVAX, originally developed by VaxGen Inc. and now held by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, a nonprofit founded by some former VaxGen employees.

    ALVAC uses canarypox, a bird virus altered so it can't cause human disease, to ferry synthetic versions of three HIV genes into the body. AIDSVAX contains a genetically engineered version of a protein on HIV's surface. The vaccines are not made from whole virus -- dead or alive -- and can't cause HIV.

    Neither vaccine in the study prevented HIV infection when tested individually in earlier trials, and dozens of scientists had called the new one futile when it began in 2003.

    "I really didn't have high hopes at all that we would see a positive result," Fauci confessed.

    The results proved the skeptics wrong.

    "The combination is stronger than each of the individual members," said the Army's Col. Kim.

    The study tested the combo in HIV-negative Thai men and women ages 18 to 30 at average risk of becoming infected. Half received four "priming" doses of ALVAC and two "boost" doses of AIDSVAX over six months. The others received dummy shots. No one knew who got what until the study ended.

    All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines. Participants were followed for three years after vaccination ended.

    According to the results: New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31% lower risk of infection for the vaccine group.

    The vaccine had no effect on levels of HIV in the blood of those who did become infected. That had been another goal of the study -- seeing whether the vaccine could limit damage to the immune system and help keep infected people from developing full-blown AIDS.

    That result is "one of the most important and intriguing findings of this trial," Dr. Fauci said. It suggests that the signs scientists have been using to gauge whether a vaccine was actually giving protection may not be valid.

    "It is conceivable that we haven't even identified yet" what really shows immunity, which is both "important and humbling" after decades of vaccine research, Dr. Fauci added.

    Details of the $105 million study will be given at a vaccine conference in Paris in October.

    This is the third big vaccine trial since 1983, when HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS. In 2007, Merck & Co. stopped a study of its experimental vaccine after seeing it did not prevent HIV infection. Later analysis suggested the vaccine might even raise the risk of infection in certain men. The vaccine itself didn't cause infection. In 2003, AIDSVAX flunked two large trials, the first late-stage tests of any AIDS vaccine at the time.

    It is unclear whether vaccine makers will seek to license the two-vaccine combo in Thailand. Before the trial began, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said other studies would be needed before the vaccine could be considered for U.S. licensing.

    Also unclear is whether Thai volunteers who received dummy shots will now be offered the vaccine. Researchers had said they would do so if the vaccine showed clear benefit, defined as reducing the risk of infection by at least 50%.

    Those issues, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Kim said. Scientists want to know how long will protection last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial.

    The study was done in Thailand because U.S. Army scientists did pivotal research in that country when the AIDS epidemic emerged there, isolating virus strains and providing genetic information on them to vaccine makers. The Thai government also strongly supported the idea of doing the study.

    Copyright © 2009 Associated Press

  • #2
    So they should be lining up outside Nana, Patpong, etc etc getting their shots!

    Comment


    • #3
      i don't think a vaccine that reduces your risk by 31% will be of much use to nana p4p'ers. about the same as taking 2 short-times each night instead of 3.
      but just the possibility that something might work someday is better news that we've had thus far.

      Comment


      • #4
        A one-off vaccine against a lifetime on antiretrovirals...I wonder how this one got past the pharmaceutical giants ?
        You men eat your dinner, eat your pork and beans
        I eat more chicken, than any man ever seen, yeah, yeah

        Comment


        • #5
          Thailand having all these wonder cures that turn out to be nonsense is a recurring theme unfortunately. For instance in this test was there a control group that got a placebo? If not, that invalidates the whole test as far as I am concerned as those interested in a vaccine may have a different behavioral pattern than those that are not which could account for the 31%. Sorry, but probably just someone looking for limelight and more funding. I expect future studies to completely debunk this drug.

          Comment


          • #6
            Good point Jadeite - yes according to articles I have read the subjects in the study were blind regarding whether they received the vaccine or a placebo.

            The 95% confidence intervals for the two groups are as follows:

            vaccine group 51 +/- 14 out of 8197
            control group 74 +/- 17 out of 8198

            Because there is some overlap in the two intervals it is conceivable that the difference in the number of infections between the two groups is the result of random variation.

            We shouldn't make a conclusion too quickly about this vaccine but I hope that it works or that something better is soon to come.
            And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

            Comment


            • #7
              This report of a vaccine that reduces risk by 31% is an absolute joke.

              The variation in infection rates could easily be taken into account by chance.

              That the world's media has picked up the story & is spruiking the result just shows how gullible they are.

              The real rate of reduction is .28%, hardly enough to make you confident. Wankers...
              Despite the high cost of living, it continues to be popular.

              Comment


              • #8
                Right on, Pacman

                And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

                Comment


                • #9
                  i agree... the difference in infection could absolutely be chance.... it isn't big enough to be a sure thing...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have lots of experience looking at data although admitedly not biostat.

                    While it's unclear if the null hypothesis sould be rejected my guess is that they're onto something and this will lead to further breakthoughs.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Mathematically, it is possible that the difference is just chance (or bad luck, it depends which side you are, with or without placebo...).
                      It is a trend, not a definite %.
                      As with any other scientific tests, it needs to be confirmed by a counter analysis, and perhaps a 3rd one.
                      3 tests with the same trend would then become a quasi certitude.

                      However, I agree with PigDogg. It shows light at the end of the tunnel.

                      But perhaps it will take another 10 years for simply knowing how far is this light...
                      a froggy, lost in translation and in Africa... and no, I am not the one on the pic swinging a club ... I am the one holding the pin !!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        http://online.wsj.com/article....Stories

                        Data Call Into Question HIV Study Results

                        Haven't fully read it yet as I am supposed to be working atm! Thorough article.
                        And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche

                        Comment



                        Working...
                        X