Are you married

[olekunde]

.....

[mirimark]

This is pretty Funny.   NO REPLIES and the topic was created on January 12th.
Are we that paranoid that a simple comment will out you ?
Errrrr,,,  Fuck that, you go first, I'm not going first.  I'll do it if you do it. Think we'll get caught if we do it?

[Guest]

I am Happy divorced

[BAM]

I really feel sorry for the 5 guys that checked off: "Yes, and my life is fucked up but i jerk off to Asian-TS"

[Guest]

Divorced twice, happily. Fucked LBs, far more happily.

[dummy_plug]

You should add another slot for 'Engaged, but before I signed my death certificate I fucked as many ladyboys as I could'.

[SPIRIT CRUSHER]

You should add another slot for 'Engaged, but before I signed my death certificate I fucked as many ladyboys as I could'

Happily never been married nor do i intend to get married in the near future.One pussy for the rest of ya life will never compare to unlimited ladyboy cock in bangkok.

[post-op lover]

Hey, you need to have an option for those guys who are married to LBs!!! Well, the only ones who could be are probably married to post-ops, and, men, if I had a post-op, I doubt I'd be hanging around this site.

Hey, that makes me think - there's a post-op I'd like to know more about. She was a hottie on the web in yesteryear. See my next thread about Kiana.

[rob69in]

Not married, never have been married, & never will be to a, money grabbing, gold digging, attitude ridden, sex-less western women.

What sane person enters into a contract where by 50% + of his entire estate becomes someone else, without a single contribution from them, 366 days after it was signed.

Get real !!

[post-op lover]

Not married, never have been married, & never will be to a, money grabbing, gold digging, attitude ridden, sex-less western women.

What sane person enters into a contract where by 50% + of his entire estate becomes someone else, without a single contribution from them, 366 days after it was signed.

Get real !!

2 words: Penelope Cruz!

I used to have a thing for Julia Roberts, but she got married and knocked up by someone other than me. But Penelope - wowza! And in yesteryear, Elle Macpherson and Rachel Hunter could have married me and gotten half my possessions, and I would have been fine (hey, maybe it works that I would get half theirs...).

Oh, but these fine lasses are probably not included among the sexless money grabbing western women.

Mmmm, pen el o pe....I can say that forever. God, what a hottie.

[tropical]

What sane person enters into a contract where by 50% + of his entire estate becomes someone else, without a single contribution from them, 366 days after it was signed.

Get real !!

I agree Rob,cant see myself wasting/loosing any hard earnt asetts to some chick that is only around for a couple of years and takes the lions share of your estate.
 Better to be single, independant, financially comfortable,retire at 45,and play the field,the rest of your life.
 Although I wouldnt say it is only western women capable of this,I think all woman are very capable of this....

[dummy_plug]

As Kanye West would say, "We want pre-nups!" I got mine drafted up already, but I think my fiancee is actually worth more than I am.

[relpax]

How do pre nups work actually? I know this sounds like a silly question but take the following circumstance:

Person x is relatively cash poor but will soon improve his finances substantially following the completion of training. person y is in a career with limited jumps in income (say fixed incomes like teachers). X and Y want to get married but want to sign a pre nup. It seems to me that a pre nup does not make sense in this case. Or am I missing something?

The above circumstance is not unlike the situation faced by many highly trained professionals in the USA (For example, in my field of medicine we have to take delayed rewards, sometimes for almost a decade before becoming more financially secure. In my case, 4 years undergrad, 4 years medical school, 5 years residency before getting settled) Can a prenup be structured to account for the big changes that are on the horizon? My guess is that if you get married the future changes become marital property. Am I wrong about that? Any law folks in the forum?

[rob69in]

I do not know how pre - nups work in the USA, but in the UK they are not worth the paper they are written on once you actually get married, i find this point especially rediculous. This is a contract, does that mean all contracts aren't worth the paper they are written on?

If you live together without getting married then a pre - nup carrys more wieght, & despite popular belief there is no such thing as a common law wife, ( in UK ) ask your UK soliciter to clarify this point. However on any "living together" split he / she, who has the most receipts walks away with the most loot. Unfortunately the legal system is bias towards the female so don't expect a fair result.

The CSA created to track & bill absent parents is a scam, it was set up to profit the state, which is exactly what its done. It cannot supply a list of absent mothers it has tracked & billed, because there are virtually none. It can also not really provide any tangible evidence to support the fact that it has gone after absent fathers, the harder it looks the more it costs, the less profit the state makes. So it is not motivated or designed to go after properly absent parents. Instead it has gone after, least effort, ( read least cost ) maximum reward. It has thrown out previous court agreements over monthly payments, as these peoples where abouts are easily traceable & for little administrive effort the state profits. Couple this to the manner the courts operate where by custody is given to the lowest wage earner, ( 99% of the time the women ) rather than the best parent or what might be best for the child, why, because the higher wage earner can make higher payments means more money for the state.

Alot of people in the UK don't realise that the monthly payments made thru' the CSA have a percentage deducted by the state ( for what ??........ PROFIT !! ), & that deduction can be quite large. There the CSA's interest ends, they might eventually get round to giving the receipiant there share, but don't count on it. Hence the fiasco it is in now.

If you consider all this to be BS, this is my advice to you, book an appointment with a soliciter / barrister specialising in divorce, I did, it was the best £65 I ever spent. Hence I am not married & never will be.

I agree that couples should take the responsibilty of the children they have, but the manner in which the UK judicial system & state exicutes its policies in this respect is not in the best interests of the children or either party concerned. It is exicuted for PROFIT !!

I also agree all women are capable of the same, but its what you get in return, I would suggest western women actively persue a relationship with minimal imput from themselves. Especially financially, & later on, once the trap has sprung, the sex will be turned off, & they will discontinue looking after there looks. After all they now have what they came for, a provider, why bother with any more effort theres nothing more to get.

With all the travel i have been lucky enough to have in my life, i have sampled a huge quantity of GG's, LB's, TS / TV, ( I Can't speak for men as its not really my thing ) mainly in the P4P arena. Without doubt the western orientated are at the bottom of the ladder when put against there Asian / South American / Latina counter parts, in virtually all respects, passion, sex, fun to be with, good company, the whole deal really.

A friend of mine once said to me, he was an old engineer getting near to retirement, I was his apprentice, "All women are prostitutes son, its just the currency & media that varies". I thought this was a very harsh statement to make & I was not convinced, but the more you think about it, & the more experiences you have the more that statement rings true. You... ARE ... going to pay one way or another, if its not in hard cash, it will be in other ways, food, drinks, nightclub entry, taxi service, odd job man, bar tab, the list is endless, & for what, the chance to get some "beaver" !! For those who have a "flex-crush" physique, look like the latest female desired heart throb, & are hung like a horse, you are proabably in with a shout on getting something for nothing, but for us mere mortals get used to the idea of your paying.        

I am sad that this has reached this stage, & the general attitude & not so well hidden agenda of western women has wrecked the situation for the minority of genuine women out there. I personally have yet to meet an unattached western women who I thought was genuine, but they are out there, as a couple of friends are happily married & have been for the last 30yrs. But on the other hand virtually all my other friends are not happy with there relationship / partener, but cannot end the situation because of the financial ruin that will take place for them, & of course they were the main contributer.

The only real safe guard is, don't get married, you have absolutely nothing to gain, unless your female partener happens to be wealthy, but statistics state wealthy women / financially stable women don't get married ( I wonder why ). Live together, if you must, with a pre - nup, it is true 2 can live together cheaper than living apart & try to ensure you buy ( & keep the receipt ) of everything you wish to keep when the split comes, try to keep her name off everything. The final most extreme measure is, get a vasectomy, no kids, no CSA, no rip off. As soon as children enter any kind of split up someone is going to get ripped off, the state will see to that.

As a monger on the P4P deal you take away the thearatricals, the charade, the scam, & you know where you stand, ( for the most part ) once in that position you can relax, enjoy, indulge, have fun. I thoroughly enjoy taking my P4P chosen partener out for dinner, drinks, whatever we want to get up to. Go to the LOS, the Philippines, South / Latin America & enjoy, you only get one go & this is it, SO DON'T WASTE IT ON MARRAIGE, unless of course all I have said above is what you really, really want !! ( I doubt it tho' )

Just my thoughts.                

[dummy_plug]

Hopefully a legal professional will speak up on the definitions of a pre-nup, but I'll try to sum it to the best of my limited knowledged. A pre-nuptial agreement is a contract between two people about to wed that spells out how assets will be distributed in the event of divorce. Essentially, its up to you how you want to structure the actual agreement, but its primarily composed of 3 parts - assets you possess prior to marriage, assets you earn (i.e. income, investments, interest, etc...) during the life of the marriage, and extraordinary assets you earn (i.e. inheritance). You can spell out specific assets, for example your Porsche Boxster, that will remain your property even if you divorce. Typically in most states in the US couple assets are divided 50/50 without regard to who earned it or who had it prior to the marriage, so the pre-nups help protect these assets. I'm not sure as to the effectiveness of the pre-nup, but its my understanding that it will usually hold as it is a binding contract. I've heard of a few instances, I think most notable would be former GE Chairman Jack Welch, where courts overrode the pre-nup because the terms were not commensurate with the other party's participation in the union. But I think that is extremely rare.