aubrey new pictures

[Stewart]

remember that you have yet to be her customer, and "prospective" clients as you put it, are a dime a dozen, so until then quit with the crying and self-righteous criticism. You have already proved yuor own outcome that you would not be a pleasant customer worth the effort. You come across as the old couple in a busy restaurant arguing over peanuts.

Not sure the last part is entirely fair, but the first part is totally correct.

For people in 'normal' businesses, it is hard enough figuring out the serious prospects from the people who will never buy. But in this particular service industry, it must be impossible.......these girls get dozens/hundreds of messages/mails, and probably 90% + are from guys who will NEVER be a customer, total dreamers.

No way do the girls have the time to try to qualify these people out. Also remember the income disparity. The cost of sms's for the ladies is proportionally very high.......the cost for DP is peanuts!! (well, I thought that was funny )

[stogie bear]

(jmaryt @ Jun. 20 2006,06:00) she/he

I'm getting tired of seeing this. Stop it or post elsewhere.

[snejana_demientrovska]

hey what happen to jmaryt's post its gone??

[stogie bear]

They have both been deleted.

[snejana_demientrovska]

ohh too bad i hope to soap opera is gonna continue

[stogie bear]

It may well continue, Minnie. I love a bit of controversial banter as much as anyone!

But I'm getting tired of seeing Aubrey referred to as 'he/she' or 'him/her'. That's unacceptable behaviour on a message board dedicated to ladyboys and their admirers. I hope you understand.

[Guest]

Thanks Stogie, for the policing.

Ronin

[Road Runner]

Confused?

You won't be, after tonight's episode of.......

[jmaryt]

hi!..stogie!

that's "bullshit" and you know it!..you are just trying to protect the ladyboy posters!i will not use that description anymore!..ok?..so please put back the post!
whayt i have to say is as imprtant as anyone else's post!..i amperforming a public service as other posters are!..i have done nothing to have my posts deleted and you know it!

[stogie bear]

(jmaryt @ Jun. 20 2006,21:50) i will not use that description anymore!..ok?

Thank you. I appreciate it.

[jmaryt]

to stogie!

your comments were noted!..i will conform to your request!..however may i add for the record,that my referring to the ladyboys as him/her,or he/she is an entirely accurate description,as i am sure you will agree!

[Road Runner]

Hello Jmaryt,

I DON'T agree!

It is very insulting to refer to a male to female transsexual as he or him in any context.

My Thai girlfriend has it done to her on very rare occasions and I know the effect it has.
It very nearly makes my blood boil and I normally have considerable patience.

From now on I shall be referring to you as he/she  him/her.

That is if I can be bothered to read or answer any further posts from you as I find they are becoming rather tedious and repetative.

RR.

[rxpharm]

I agree with Road Runner. It is very insulting to refer to ts/tg/lbs as he/him.

Would you "tell it like is" directly to the the lbs you know and call them he/she, him/her on the justification of being accurate?

Trying to "grind an axe" carrying on a grudge is not the same as performing a public service.

[stogie bear]

(jmaryt @ Jun. 21 2006,22:25) to stogie! however may i add for the record,that my referring to the ladyboys as him/her,or he/she is an entirely accurate description,as i am sure you will agree!

I do NOT agree and you are now banned from the forum.

Unfortunately - anyone using the same ISP in the Boston area is also banned from the forum and your entire range of IP numbers has been banned from accessing the forum also.

I tried it the nice way and it didn't work.

Byeeee!

[relpax]

hhmm that would kinda suck if you used the same isp in the boston area. hhmm i would consider rounding up a posse and kicking the shit out of jmaryt if i were in that lot.

man i am glad i did not take that job at mass gen!