Ann Coulter

[kahuna]

(grunyen @ Nov. 06 2006,12:38) Calling names is easy. Making coherent points that don't involve men with tits is beyond what I've seen from the majority of this crew.

 Then why and the hell are you here?

Damn, I thought this forum was a place to have fun and share and most of all to savor the lovely ladyboys...

Guess I'm wrong...Perhaps you should be consulted before anyone is allowed to join the forum...Maybe you can design an IQ test of some sort for potential members that excludes, of course, any mention of beautiful ladyboys (not men with tits dude, how fucking rude).

But then I suppose after all is said and done, there would only be one Forum and one poster...Guess who?

Such superior intelligence that seemingly you alone possess does indeed have it's price...I suspect that it can be very lonely in that Ivory Tower...

kahuna

[Guest]

Oh, dear. Now I'm sorry I said anything at all.

I just thought it was unfair, and a bit simplistic, for the original poster to attack a book -- any book -- by quoting what someone had written about it in a review on Amazon instead of after reading it himself.

I agree with most of you above. I'm sick of this kind of political bickering. It accomplishes nothing but to bring out the worst in everyone.

[Groundhog]

(post-op lover @ Nov. 06 2006,13:43) Hey, you're putting too much stock in having a JD.

What do they call the Med School graduate ranked last in his class?

Doctor.

   

What do they call the Law school student who ranked last in her class?

1. Congresswoman?
2. Carny Barker?
3. Ambulance chaser?
4. Ann Coulter
5. All of the above?



(well ... maybe it's just a little, eensie-weensie bit LAME)

[post-op lover]

What the hell? Someone called Ann Coulter a congresswoman?!?!? Yikes

[Guest]

What do they call the Law school student who ranked last in her class?[/quote]
Judge?

[Guest]

[quote]
(Groundhog @ Nov. 06 2006,18:42)

What do they call the Law school student who ranked last in her class?

Judge?

[geezer]

Why do we have 2 threads for this? Anyway bestways to talk about ladyboys and politics. The problem with politicians who rely too much on logic is that people are not logical and if you expect them too be it's always going to fail.

Can anyone understand ladyboy logic? No. We may have a better insight but we are still constantly suprised.

Turn it around. Am I logical. No. Where I live there are plenty of beautiful and attractive women who are available. Am I interested. No. I'd rather fly 12 hours to Thailand and pick up a girl in some bar that if it were not for the girls I would no go into if it was next to my house.

Well hope that's covered all bases with ladyboys and politics anyway.

[post-op lover]

This is the fishbox, we don't discuss matters of importance here. The LBs are the first door on the left, amigo.

[Groundhog]

(geezer @ Nov. 08 2006,00:08) Why do we have 2 threads for this? Anyway bestways to talk about ladyboys and politics.

Well, Ann's the Man... that's as close as I can get to LB+politics


There are two threads because I started a Poll after this one got started (Oh, I guess I started this one too)

Anyway, isn't this fun ... this is The Fishbox ... I get to discuss anything non-LB just so long as it is controversial and outrageous

Have you seen Borat?

[geezer]

No haven't seen borat yet but it looks hilareous. He has another character Bruno who is a Gay Austrian. This clip of him at Spring Break talking to the wrestlers is one of the funniest things i've ever seen.

Bruno at Spring Break

[Guest]

(kahuna @ Nov. 06 2006,14:09)

(grunyen @ Nov. 06 2006,12:38) Calling names is easy. Making coherent points that don't involve men with tits is beyond what I've seen from the majority of this crew.

 Then why and the hell are you here?

Damn, I thought this forum was a place to have fun and share and most of all to savor the lovely ladyboys...

Guess I'm wrong...Perhaps you should be consulted before anyone is allowed to join the forum...Maybe you can design an IQ test of some sort for potential members that excludes, of course, any mention of beautiful ladyboys (not men with tits dude, how fucking rude).

But then I suppose after all is said and done, there would only be one Forum and one poster...Guess who?

Such superior intelligence that seemingly you alone possess does indeed have it's price...I suspect that it can be very lonely in that Ivory Tower...

kahuna

This reply is incoherant and makes no sense as any type of rebuttal. Your lack of logic and understanding of causation, debate, and rational response make it difficult to decide exactly how to go about answering.  You might as well say "Do you change a lightbuld with a fish, a potatoe, or a walked to the river and drowned myself?"

You act as if a nonsensical post is a legitimate question and leave the responder to figure out exactly how to deal with it. You pretty much made my point for me in doing so.

So, let me try to make some sense out of this:

1) Why the hell am I here? Hmm... well obviously it's not for your brilliant political discourse. It must be the masturbation fodder.

2) Yeah, I think it is. So what's your point? That's still 99% of what goes on here. I didn't start this thread.

3) What are you even talking about? How does me approving forum members have to do with anytihng? I never said a thing about who should join or participate? I'm just going to throw in my two cents just as well as anyone.  IQ test?  What are you even talking about? Nothing you are saying is related to anything.

4) So there are no men with tits. I forgot, some people here actually believe that the girls are magical third gender persons from another land who ride in on the backs of winged unicorns.  The mental gymnastics some people go through to convince themselves that they are "ok" or not gay or whatever they need to get through the night still amazes me. How is it rude exactly? I'm not standing on the street corner pointing at a girl in front of her friends and saying "EW gross, you're a man with tits".  That would be rude. I'm being brief and humorous in the service of making a punchy and direct point.  Yes, that requires hyperbole, exageration, or curtness to make a point sometimes. Obviously, I am just as turned on by this type of thing as you are. Chicks with dicks, shemales, transgender, ladyboys, katoey, whatever. Yuo can call them olive salad- it doesn't matter. I think it's hot. I don't care about the whole "am I gay" crap. I rub one out to whatever I like.

5) Again, what are you talking about? I never said anything about one forum and one poster. You can post all you want. I never said anything about limitiing anyone elses post. Why do you assume that everyone else is a fascist just because that's what rots in your head? Anyone is more than welcome to post to their hears content, either rationally or insanely and incoherently. Don't cry so much if someone else calls you on your bullshit. Your right to post it doesn't mean it can't be questioned.

6) again... stunningly simplistic. Are you the youngest child by chance? My intellect is, statistically speaking, two standard deviations above the norm, but that's not all that relevant. I'm good at humanities topics, exceptional at analysis, and I suck at math. Probably everyone that ever logged onto this forum could ace me on any math test. What does any of that have to do with the price of eggs?  I posited that the level of political analysis I've seen here is nill, and I've still yet to see anything that changes my initial perception.

[smuttleydfs]

(grunyen @ Nov. 08 2006,18:18) [4) So there are no men with tits. I forgot, some people here actually believe that the girls are magical third gender persons from another land who ride in on the backs of winged unicorns.  The mental gymnastics some people go through to convince themselves that they are "ok" or not gay or whatever they need to get through the night still amazes me. How is it rude exactly? I'm not standing on the street corner pointing at a girl in front of her friends and saying "EW gross, you're a man with tits".  That would be rude. I'm being brief and humorous in the service of making a punchy and direct point.  Yes, that requires hyperbole, exageration, or curtness to make a point sometimes. Obviously, I am just as turned on by this type of thing as you are. Chicks with dicks, shemales, transgender, ladyboys, katoey, whatever. Yuo can call them olive salad- it doesn't matter. I think it's hot. I don't care about the whole "am I gay" crap. I rub one out to whatever I like.

Grunyen

Kahuna's biggest point that he was trying to make is that even though this is a non-public forum, refering to the ladyboys within this website as "men with tits" is rude and uncalled for and also a generalization that the moderators have requested not be made within this forum. There are several ladyboys who review the content of this forum and they have chosen this gender, be it scientifically sound or not, and out of respect to these people kindly refer to them as ladyboys, shemales, transexuals or all of the aforementioned. Do not call them "men with tits"

I hope that is plain enough for you.



Thank you

[kahuna]

(smuttleydfs @ Nov. 09 2006,09:18)

(grunyen @ Nov. 08 2006,18:18) [4) So there are no men with tits. I forgot, some people here actually believe that the girls are magical third gender persons from another land who ride in on the backs of winged unicorns.  The mental gymnastics some people go through to convince themselves that they are "ok" or not gay or whatever they need to get through the night still amazes me. How is it rude exactly? I'm not standing on the street corner pointing at a girl in front of her friends and saying "EW gross, you're a man with tits".  That would be rude. I'm being brief and humorous in the service of making a punchy and direct point.  Yes, that requires hyperbole, exageration, or curtness to make a point sometimes. Obviously, I am just as turned on by this type of thing as you are. Chicks with dicks, shemales, transgender, ladyboys, katoey, whatever. Yuo can call them olive salad- it doesn't matter. I think it's hot. I don't care about the whole "am I gay" crap. I rub one out to whatever I like.

Grunyen

Kahuna's biggest point that he was trying to make is that even though this is a non-public forum, refering to the ladyboys within this website as "men with tits" is rude and uncalled for and also a generalization that the moderators have requested not be made within this forum. There are several ladyboys who review the content of this forum and they have chosen this gender, be it scientifically sound or not, and out of respect to these people kindly refer to them as ladyboys, shemales, transexuals or all of the aforementioned. Do not call them "men with tits"

I hope that is plain enough for you.



Thank you







 

Exactly my point...Thank you Smuttleydfs for articulating it much better than I did...

Grunyen...I don't care about your politics or how brilliant you believe that you are,
but I do care a great deal about how you refer to these beautiful creatures and I will call you on it every time...

[Randyman]

(smuttleydfs @ Nov. 08 2006,20:18) kindly refer to them as ladyboys, shemales, transexuals or all of the aforementioned. Do not call them "men with tits"

I hope that is plain enough for you.

Thank you







 

Yeah, what he said

Usually, I edit out the male references, but I've been "snipped" lol

randyman

[smuttleydfs]

(Randyman @ Nov. 08 2006,21:07)  Usually, I edit out the male references, but I've been "snipped"  lol

                randyman

Does that make you a eunuch RM? or a gelding

Do you think this one the POL would love or what?