Sex with a man. (Not including LB's of course)

[harley quinn]

has to be a ladyboy for me with or without implants = but I'm sure that I pass muster as a filthy swine

and I love it

[Onebadindan]

So far i have to Say no... but never say never.....

[katoeylover]

Never, never, never say never again!!

[Guest]

I said never, and that will always be.

But what degree of femininity defines LB vs man? Usually it's clear cut, but some femboys seem like men to me and LBs to other members. So I suppose your answer may include that ambiguous element.

Whatever, I don't care what people do in their bedrooms or with whom. How you are as a decent human being is what counts.

[kahuna]

I say NEVER and I mean NEVER...But five years ago, I NEVER would have thought I would be lusting after Thai ladyboys either...

[Guest]

True, I agree on your point, however, at least I feel there is a much, much larger barrier there, which I suspect is how other posters were thinking too. The barrier to LBs seems to have been much smaller, or should we say the river easier to cross.

[strocube]

There was no catagory for my response so I didn't vote, but I'd totally do a cute femboy like the one in Stogie's pics. Or, I could see myself doing a really pretty-faced, smooth-bodied, feminine asian (fem) boy. Which I guess is pretty much the description of the lovely creature in the pics.
If that makes me filthy swine or a flaming , then whatever. Masculine, hairy, regular dudes do absolutely nothing for me though.
Cheers

[Onebadindan]

.. .I second that

[nigel69]

I agree with strocube's response.Smooth Femboys-no hairy men.

[hardpaolo]

(strocube @ Aug. 11 2007,04:51) There was no catagory for my response so I didn't vote, but I'd totally do a cute femboy like the one in Stogie's pics.    Or, I could see myself doing a really pretty-faced, smooth-bodied, feminine asian (fem) boy. Which I guess is pretty much the description of the lovely creature in the pics.
If that makes me filthy swine or a flaming   , then whatever. Masculine, hairy, regular dudes do absolutely nothing for me though.
Cheers

There is a category for you then, its "Don't float my boat"

[TTChang]

(ziggystardust @ Aug. 11 2007,03:17) ... I don't care what people do in their bedrooms or with whom. How you are as a decent human being is what counts.

I agree 100% ziggy - but as it's you posting, I'm sure we'll find someone to rubbish your view ...:devil:

Now, am I going to be influenced by this stogie person? Will there be a day when I perv into Kaos with a lecherous grin on my face?

Funny word 'Never'.....

[Torurot]

So what you are saying is so long as it's hairless you'd "do it". Hair being the problem, not the cock?

[jadeite]

Ladyboys for me need to meet a certain middle line:

TOO MALE: whiskers, body hair, deep voice, overly muscular build, male haircut, face looks too much like a guy. All are deal breakers! For instance, Moo's haircut out of prison would be a deal breaker for me whereas with a female haircut she rocks.

MIDDLE: this is where I like it. Flat or naturally formed breasts, have a shade of femininess, in a quick glance they might be passable or at least be obvious to be a ladyboy.

TOO ALTERED: those fake plastic breasts, too much hormones to where they have a tiny shriveled cock, or have had the chop. Though may reluctantly at times venture to ones in this range. I also dislike other alterations such as piercing & tattoos for what it is worth.

[daveduke007]

(Torurot @ Aug. 11 2007,10:28)   So what you are saying is so long as it's hairless you'd "do it". Hair being the problem, not the cock?  

Had to laugh at a comment by my girl the other day on the phone.

When discussing hormone tablets she said " I need take" "I not want chin have hair"

[Guest]

I would much prefer ladyboys but I must confess to receiving BJ's from two massage guys (no I didn't reciprocate) - quite good too they were.