Which came first?

[olekunde]

your lust for ggs or lbs. i am talking about your 'love' for los

[mister_smith]

For me it was the LB's, I've never been with a GG in Thailand no way would I fly 8000 miles just to fuck a girl

[katoeylover]

Me too- it was the lure of the LB - Not lOS in the first place.

Now though I would visit thailand if there wasnt any ladyboys.

[stogie bear]

Femininity trumps actual birth sex, so of course I found girls more attractive to start with because that's all I knew (and expected...)

Eventually I finally got around to discovering that boys could be as feminine as girls and now I know that in most cases they are actally BETTER at being girls than girls are.

Watch 'em dance, watch 'em put on make up, watch 'em flounce around acting like wot a reel gurlee should do!

Ladyboys ROCK!

[TTChang]

I discovered LOS first .... culture, history, tourism, beaches, people, business, food, cost of living ..... + Soi Cowboy & GGs  

No turning back now....   (well, not to Soi Cowboy, anyway!)

[daveduke007]

My first outing to    was for the Manchester United "Far East" tour in July 2001
4 nights in KL then 6 nights in BKK
I've never been the same since

The "lure" of the ladyboys came in August 2004 (pic of the girl below) and also due to this site    

Dave007...

[Guest]

Well, first trip, girls, in 1990 or so.

Second trip and all others, LBs, 2002.

As noted, LBs are far more feminine than girls, with better equipment, so what's the point of a GG now?

[moe666]

O, it's so confusing.

[kahuna]

I thought this was a chicken and egg thread...

Fried or scrambled?

[69billy]

Only the total losers go to LOS just for the girls...You know the typ..the ones that can't pull a girl to save there lifes..
GG are 10 for a penny in any part of the world..
LBs are the only thing I go to LOS for...

PS..
Dave ...Last night at Stunners we had a two sexy TVs from Manchester..You do have some nice ones up there..Only shaged one of them...