One more thing for everyone-- I know all the relevant transmission stats, how it is supposedly soooo unlikely to get HIV by certain means. But one thing to remember that these studies performed in the West have usually been on HIV subtype-B, but in Thailand (and Africa) subtype-E is vastly more prevalent. They are quite different, as E shows more affinity for Langherhan's sells (sp?) rather than lymphocytes. This partially explains the predominance of heterosexual transmission in SE Asia and Africa. Western work is only beginning on this subtype-- and who knows? maybe it is more likely to be transmitted orally.
Secondly, people say it is extremely unlikely to contract HIV for men through vaginal sex... but on the other hand a shitload of people have it!!! If you look at the stats, the chance is tiny for men to get HIV through vag sex, but nonetheless millions of Africans have it!!!
Obviously vaginal sex is not the issue on this board, but the point is that the stats aren't always reliable due to different sub-types and the sheer numbers of people who have it.
Secondly, people say it is extremely unlikely to contract HIV for men through vaginal sex... but on the other hand a shitload of people have it!!! If you look at the stats, the chance is tiny for men to get HIV through vag sex, but nonetheless millions of Africans have it!!!
Obviously vaginal sex is not the issue on this board, but the point is that the stats aren't always reliable due to different sub-types and the sheer numbers of people who have it.
Comment