JEN ~ 19 (Villa Rouge)

[brocklanders]

I think Stogie brings up things that just cant translate in photos. It's true that some femboys might look passable with clothes and act passable in person. Some of the amazon muscular girls are off of hormones and the only thing feminine about them is their bolt-on tits. An aggressive LB who smokes heavy and cusses like a sailor is a lot less feminine than a femboy who is polite, demure and has a feminine voice. That was one of the problems I had with Lichey when I met her at Cascades...once she opened her mouth I was having flashbacks of Herman Monster even though her features are stunning and passable.

[doug]

What!?!?!?

Whaddaya mean ladyboys ain't born with silicone implants, shaved adam's apples and silicone injections in their asses???!??!?!?

This is an outrage!!

I tell ya, as soon as I get done jerking off over those school girl pics, I'm writing my congressman about this travesty!

Seriously, though, are you guys kidding me? The "gag! it's a boy!" crowd needs to grow up.

Two years from now after she gets her implants and the hormones plump out her hips a bit, you guys will be lining up to pump that ass of hers.

Well, just because some guys like pumping that ass when its still a bit "boyish" doesn't make them "more gay" than you. It's still the same ass!

Fuck me. A few years ago, every single ladyboy on this site looked exactly the same (if not even more boyish) as Jen. You guys make it seem like there's some clearly drawn line in the sand and if you dare to step over it, suddenly you have to turn over your "Straight-MAN Membership Card" and start marching in Gay Pride parades.

What's the difference between fucking her now when she's still a bit boyish and fucking her two years from now when she's a egocentric superstar? Does a few ounces of silicone, some better make-up skills, a bit of cosmetic surgery and a SKIRT suddenly make you less gay for fucking exactly the same person

Labels are for convenience, not confinement. Boy, girl, femboy, ladyboy, t-girl, crossdresser, etc... whatever. Who cares? If I find him/her/herm attractive I'm going to pull out my tranq gun, pop a dart in her ass and drag her back to my cave for some good old fashion caveman butt-humping.

I really don't care if you label me as "gay" or "fag" for humping somebody who's too "boy" for your tastes. All that means is that I'll get her first, and after she gets her tits done, you'll all be lining up to get my sloppy seconds .

[69billy]

[Bit Beefy]

(doug @ Oct. 08 2007,09:44) What!?!?!?

Whaddaya mean ladyboys ain't born with silicone implants, shaved adam's apples and silicone injections in their asses???!??!?!?

This is an outrage!!

I tell ya, as soon as I get done jerking off over those school girl pics, I'm writing my congressman about this travesty!

Seriously, though, are you guys kidding me?  The "gag! it's a boy!" crowd needs to grow up.

Two years from now after she gets her implants and the hormones plump out her hips a bit, you guys will be lining up to pump that ass of hers.

Well, just because some guys like pumping that ass when its still a bit "boyish" doesn't make them "more gay" than you.  It's still the same ass!

Fuck me.  A few years ago, every single ladyboy on this site looked exactly the same (if not even more boyish) as Jen.  You guys make it seem like there's some clearly drawn line in the sand and if you dare to step over it, suddenly you have to turn over your "Straight-MAN Membership Card" and start marching in Gay Pride parades.

What's the difference between fucking her now when she's still a bit boyish and fucking her two years from now when she's a egocentric superstar?  Does a few ounces of silicone, some better make-up skills, a bit of cosmetic surgery and a SKIRT suddenly make you less gay for fucking exactly the same person

Labels are for convenience, not confinement.  Boy, girl, femboy, ladyboy, t-girl, crossdresser, etc...  whatever.  Who cares?  If I find him/her/herm attractive I'm going to pull out my tranq gun, pop a dart in her ass and drag her back to my cave for some good old fashion caveman butt-humping.

I really don't care if you label me as "gay" or "fag" for humping somebody who's too "boy" for your tastes.  All that means is that I'll get her first, and after she gets her tits done, you'll all be lining up to get my sloppy seconds .

That rite there is a great shout or should i say a number of great shouts

[PigDogg]

(stogie bear @ Oct. 07 2007,06:11) Feminine features to me include not drinking or smoking. They include wearing ladylike clothes and having a shy and serene state of mind... They also include a conservative application of makeup and a submissive nature.

[RonN]

Totally hot!!!!!   Stogie, you ought to do an entire photoset of this femboy.  Yikes!!!!  

[Socrates999]

(stogie bear @ Oct. 07 2007,19:11) ... Don't get me wrong - I too love fucking heavily made up sluts up the ass with abandon!

What's a "bandon"? Does it hurt them? Where can you buy one?

[stogie bear]

No, silly... a band on... usually The Alan Parsons Project or some Stones... you know!

[gart4571]

I thought that "a band on" was one of those things that Billy wears at the base of his cock when he fucks all those georgous ladyboys.

[geosight]

What's the difference between fucking her now when she's still a bit boyish and fucking her two years from now when she's a egocentric superstar?

the difference is , now he is a he ( and looks like a he and im not into fucking boys ). yet after two years and her sponser buys her a new body she'll be fucking gorgeous . Untill then you can have " him "

[mickey_o]

Stogie, you really know how to start a good thread!

Cheers!

[Sombat]

Hi All

My first post- and an appreciation of a very fine thread from all who have contributed so far.

What I thought I saw in this interesting thread was a kind of potted history of the recent developments in Thai LBs.

I have been around ladyboys in Thailand for quite a long time. What strikes me clearly, in reading this thread, is how significantly the girls themselves have changed in the time I've been around them.

If I go back around 8 years, it was extremely rare to find a girl with bolt-ons. Maybe 0ne girl in fifty or a Hundred would have them. And if they did, they often weren't nice. Silicon in those days was much nearer to concrete coconuts than the new soft and natural "jellie" silicon that they use now.

And it was expensive. Maybe Bt 60,000 to 90,000 even then. Now, the latest can be had for Bt45,000 and off work for only 3 days!


Also, back then,the use of hormones was nowhere on the scale that it is now. So many of the girls nowadays have hormonal tits large enough to put a modest Thia GG to shame. But along with it goes a total lack of a hard on and /or dry cummers.



8 years ago- MOST- of the LBs that I went with or knew were similar to Jen in Stogies photos. Most of them were guys with long hair (or whigs) who felt themselves to be females. And Stogies girl would have been a real find. Maybe Stogies stuck in the past!

However, I think Stogies description of whats "feminine" has hit the nail on the head and is how ALL LBs should start out IMHO- from the inside as it were. If bolt ons etc do it for you then get them fitted. but if the emotional foundation of femininity is not there then I think its a lost cause.

I think Jens really sexy! But then Im just an old shirt lifter!

Thanks again for some very interesting points.

Sombat

[TTChang]

You're very welcome on this forum, Mr shirtlifter sombat !

[stogie bear]

Great post, Sombat... you old shirtlifter!

[richmond]

I rcognise that school uniform she obviously went to same school as Tang ' Stogie must loiter o/s with bags of lollies(sweets)