For me, this is the picture of near perfection in a LB's feminine appearance.
Ladyboy Photos
Collapse
X
-
Very good pictures, I think. I want to tke some pics myself when I'm in BKK in may.
Especially that you're using no distracting background sets the focus totally on the girl. I like that a lot. Maybe you should try to have them less centered, so that the girl isn't in always in the middle, might give the pics a bit more vividness. Only my humble opinion.
Keep the good work, I'd like to see more.
I will try to post some too if I can persuade any to pose for me.
CheersComment
-
You can tell shes a postie by the "crack" in her pantiesYour got yer Mother in a whirl
Shes not sure if your a Boy or a GirlComment
-
You can tell shes a postie by the "crack" in her panties
Here in the states we call that a cemel toe.
For more in depth information on this phenomenon just go to
Great pics Ziggy. She's a really lovely girl.
Cheers,
-J"Bankin' off of the northeast wind
Salin' on a summer breeze
And skippin' over the ocean, like a stone."
-Harry NilssonComment
-
Jesus, all these years I have been calling that "look" a taco shell without the filling. On some women it is plain gross to look at. Having your denims being sucked into your vagina is not a noteworthy fashion statement.Comment
-
I would say that the background, as much as I personally like that shade of green, it's definitely too dark and "absorbs" far too much light.(ziggystardust @ Apr. 22 2007,02:31) Mmmm...if anyone can tell me why they lost all their color when posting, that would be good.
I would go for a lighter b/g that reflects light better and can differentiate from the tonal values of the model.
To better understand what I mean, try converting the pic in b+w or, simply, make a photocopy and you'll see that the tonal value (not the hue) it's too similar between the b/g and various areas on the model's body. That makes hard to have a tridimensional effect and "kills" the lights catched by the model herself.
If you prefer a dark b/g I would use a really dark one, not a middle tone and play with strong lights (on both sides) on the model.Do only what you think it's good for you, and not what others think should be good for you!Comment
-
Thanks guys for all kinds of feedback.
But tell me, do you like these kind of photos? I'm obssessed with it, i.e., taking LB pics as close as I can get to magazine like shots, and more recently, pushing in to the avant garde. I'm not there yet, but that's where I'm going.
But do you like 'em, or they're too lame?Comment
-
Some do some don't...
I personally am done with the porno pics and I almost never go to lb sites in search of them.
It's much more satisfying to see fewer, better models in better, classier poses. Mind you - this IS a porno site so no-one will make any money from the soft core angle. It's just a preference of mine and I'm sure I'm in the minority.Comment
-
>>>ZiggyStardust said: "Thanks guys for all kinds of feedback.. But tell me, do you like these kind of photos? ..
But do you like 'em, or they're too lame?" >>>
I like them, they are not lame. Perhaps use less depth of field which will take the sharpness off the background. Props are good.
>>>>Stogie Bear said: "It's much more satisfying to see fewer, better models in better, classier poses.">>>>
Agreed, Playboy style rather than PenthouseComment
-

Bloody hell... he's a moderator and he can't work the "Quote" function!
Comment