Paying for it?

[mr bartman]

one way or the other You pay,,,everyone pays but with a working girl you only pay for what ya get.....the old saying about a ex wife "the fucking you get for the fucking you got"

[BAM]

(Snick @ Jun. 28 2006,06:15) I don't pay girls to sleep with me, I pay girls to leave in the morning
--Charley Sheen

Yeah that's so true... how many times has that happened in Thailand where you have to pay them in the moring to leave....
then they want to come back later... "up to you"  

[Randyman]

(testicular @ Jun. 27 2006,21:36)  What rubbish. You can't FIND pretty Asian ladyboys where I come from so that comment is a fucking inane stupid one.

Yo testicular;

Have some decaf.
I'm sure he's talking about the financial aspects, not the quality of the ladies.
RM

[Guest]

Jesus Lord! (as my lovely wife would say). I guess I'm luckier than most - I have a great woman who fills all my daily needs yet understands I am "bastos" and need my release from reality. Needless to say I'm off to LoS the end of Sept. The only rule the wifey-po set is: (1) She doesn't want to hear about the sordid details and (2) WEAR a CONDOM!

RW

[Mai-Kee]

(stuskam @ Jun. 27 2006,17:59) (thank god its illegal in LOS and the police stamp it out wherever it occurs!!!!).

Stogie pretty much said it all. Just want to add here my few cents:

1. You can't be sure with this one?! Prostitution is illegal in LOS as it is illegal to traffic drugs. Nevertheless has Thailand the biggest Heroin and Yaba trafficking route -coming from Burma - on this planet. Nuff said! T.I.T.

2. You don't want to pay? Why? Do you also leave the restaurant without paying the bills? I tend to repeat myself here in the last couple of days: The girls offer a service - you pay! This is a business, as any other! I have absolutely no clue why this is so hard to understand. We have 2006 and people still live in moral corsets like 200 years ago.


MK

[rob69in]

At the tender age of 16 i was going thru' the trauma of an engineering apprenticeship & my practical side, hands on, mentor was a bloke in his 60's, ex merchant navy marine engineer with about a million storys to tell, from almost the same number of countrys. He thought i was an idiot ( some say nothing has changed! ), but he considered me worth talking to & training as best he could. Towards the end of my time under his watchful eye, he said to me, "Laddy, if you only learn 2 things from me, these are them, all women are are prostitutes its just the currencey that varys, & never ever get married!!".

  At the time i thought these were exceedingly harsh words, but as i travelled & gathered my own experiences, i realised what sound words & advice it was. Especially in the western hemisphere where women appear to be at there worst & the heavily biased legal system assist in removal of male assets into there hands & the governments, enter the goverments nice little earner, the CSA!!

I have had about 6 western women steady-ish relationships. Without exception i was paying & I was the one making all the effort & running about. In the UK the bloke is expected to pick up the tab on everything when you are out with a prospective girlfriend, girlfriend or wife. Drinks, food, night club entry, transit costs, trinkets to keep them happy, & so it goes on, its coming out of your hard earned cash, NOT theres. Then comes the sex, or lack of it, I have yet to have decent sex with a western women. If you do make it to the sack theres a good chance it will be begrudged & make you feel like they are doing you a massive favour! More than likely, you just get that patronizing peck on the cheak & those sarcastic words, thanks for a lovely evening. Read cheers easy soak at this point. This evening just cost you probably around £100+, in a big city £150, did you get laid, with good sex, less than a 50 / 50 chance, but YOU PAID, that female company cost you money!!

  Those few blokes not receiving this treatment are definitely in the minority, they are either rich, look like the latest hollywood / pop group heart throb, have a flex crush body & / or a big cock, or they have actually found one of the few decent western women. But if they are good looking, decent body, big cock they are unlikey to reach "marriage" as they are too much of a risk. Women can get laid anytime, anywhere, with anyone, so the priority is good provider, not good sex or soul mate. In other words the best financial / material asset option, because ultimately 50%+ will be theres with a little legal administrive inconvenience. Once again in the end you are paying.

 While you would receive an absolute torrant of abuse & denials putting this across to western women, it does not detract from the facts, you have paid for there company & the mediocre sex. Prostitution!        

 I stopped bothering with western women about 12-15years ago, they simply are not worth the financial outlay, stress, & effort, they have but one agenda themselves at your expense, & if you enter into the insane arrangement of marriage, it just gets worse. What sane, compitant, proffessional person enters into a contract whereby 50%+ of his entire material & financial estate belongs to someone else, ( regardless of pre-nup contract in the UK ) without them having to make a single contribution, 366 days after signing the contract. It is insane & totaly unjust. They are even trying to change the law so that virtually the same can be achieved if you co-habit. The end result will ultimately be more & more men will simply not enter into a steady relationship for fear of asset loss. Its a shame really as there are ( I hope ) some decent western women out there who will be tarred with the same brush as the majority of hippo gold diggers.

 So while you have your walets out paying for the drinks, food, transit costs, etc, etc on a 50 / 50 of mediocre sex, take a step back & look at what you are doing, PAYING. In most cases why are you taking her out, be brutally honest here? Sex!! If she didn't have tits, fanny, & an arse would you bother, very doubtful.

  We have now dispensed with the, rhetoric, bullshit & got down to the facts. Why not keep it strictly business, pay as you go with a provider, this allows you to control the outlay & get what... YOU... want, without endangering your financial & material estate. While in that mode, you can then broaden the playing field to encompass Latin America & Asia. For those who cannot do this, look for women of that decent in the western hemisphere. The drawback to that is, its very likely they have been "poisened" into the western women way. However I have had pretty good success in Europe sticking to Latina GG's & TS who come over to work but don't actually live here.

  Getting yourself off to the country of origin of the better providers is also a huge advantage, time limits fade away, service increases, GFE is virtually garanteed, price decreases dramatically, anal is considered virtually the norm. I find the whole arrangement far more relaxing & satisfiying, virtually stress free & i actually enjoy taking my provider out to dinner & having fun with them.

  So gentlemen, unless you are one of the very, very lucky few, who are not paying out hand over fist, get used to the idea, its not a moral, right or wrong issue, like it or not, YOUR PAYING, you are hemeraging money for GG / LB / TS company, whatever the arrangement. Thats prostitution in my book.

[Bit Beefy]

Religeous people are a stain on society and should be spat on if seen.

Did they upset you stog lol

Does anyone else here think that paying for sex has a knock on effect, especially in your own personal lives. I mean i get chicks over here and the moment they gime any jip im like fuck this, i get better service and more fun with some chik ive known for 2mins. Now b4 i started with traveling to places such as thailand i may well have taken some shit and in the end i may well have worked it out. Now i just kick them to the curb and look for someone else OR go to stunners

[Mai-Kee]

Good thoughts, Robin!
.... an even better avatar, Beefster!

[Bit Beefy]

What happens when the shoe is on the other foot gents? i.e i marry a little rich girl. 366days later i get divorced? Do i get half?

[Bit Beefy]

(Mai-Kee @ Jun. 28 2006,23:09) Good thoughts, Robin!
.... an even better avatar, Beefster!  

Thanku Sir.

[Bit Beefy]

"Laddy, if you only learn 2 things from me, these are them, all women are are prostitutes its just the currencey that varys, & never ever get married!!".

This what i will tell my 1st born

[rob69in]

(Bit Beefy @ Jun. 28 2006,17:17) What happens when the shoe is on the other foot gents? i.e i marry a little rich girl. 366days later i get divorced? Do i get half?

Yes, but as the courts have continually shown they don't fight very hard to ensure YOU get YOUR 50%.

[Bit Beefy]

(rob69in @ Jun. 28 2006,23:24)

(Bit Beefy @ Jun. 28 2006,17:17) What happens when the shoe is on the other foot gents? i.e i marry a little rich girl. 366days later i get divorced? Do i get half?

Yes, but as the courts have continually shown they don't fight very hard to ensure YOU get YOUR 50%.

And there reason for this? cos we're blokes?

[rob69in]

(Bit Beefy @ Jun. 28 2006,17:19)

"Laddy, if you only learn 2 things from me, these are them, all women are are prostitutes its just the currencey that varys, & never ever get married!!".

This what i will tell my 1st born  

Introducing children into the equation is suicide financially, even when you are not married. The government & the women benefits from this little scam, with the aid of the CSA, an organization created to profit the state only. Secondary to that agenda is paying out to the women with the child!

This is how your court appearance will go, unless you are the exception to the rule, a few clever people have beat the rap.

There will be a DNA test to prove you are the father, at your expense. The mother will have to be a seriously, & I mean seriously bad person, NOT to get custody of the child. This will be flouted on the moral high ground of being in the best interests of the child, thats utter bollox. Remember why the CSA was created, to profit the state. You will more than likely have the highest salary in the relationship this means on the absurd equation the CSA uses to calculate your monthly payments, it will be the higher figure out of the 2 of you. More profit for the state. Looking at the wildly varying monthly payments there is no set sensible calculation. For example it might be in the region of £1000 a month, your ex partener & child will see about £700-£750 a month, the state pockets the rest. They will also take your money really quickly, take there cut straight away, & then drag there heals over paying out on the partner & child. Think about the states earning potential here if your child is young, & you remain in well paid employment. Now you can see why the CSA was invented. There is also a clause in the deal, if the child remains in full time education after 18, you keep paying!!

Oh & bye the way, your ex partner can find another soak & pull the same scam, as the CSA do not take that into consideration during the second, third, fourth, etc etc, she can make quite a good living out of it.

You are now paying large, you get no female company, & no sex for this money. The scam is complete.

[rob69in]

(Bit Beefy @ Jun. 28 2006,17:17) What happens when the shoe is on the other foot gents? i.e i marry a little rich girl. 366days later i get divorced? Do i get half?

Statistically,

well established, financially independant women don't marry. I wonder why!