Tweet
I was talking to the Stogie Bear about a month ago in BKK about some of the upcoming girls we have for the summer and beyond and showing him some of the new girls from Mickey and Pedro and myself. Some of the girls as you have seen in the clubhouse and on the forum here are absolutely amazing, grade A material, AKA the "new" Natalie and Lyla, who went up 2 days ago; Talisha, Justine, May, new Noon pics, etc, etc....
His first comment was "man, these girls are stunning; too bad we have to mix them in with the average-looking girls we add to the site sometime" and we started talking about that. There is no question that some of the girls we add here are in the "10" catagory and some, to put it nicely, are not as hot-looking. Again, this goes back to what I was saying in another thread that not every girl we add here can be a perfect beauty, lest we only add 10 girls a month or so. adding 250+ girls a year, it is just not possible to find that many beautiful shemales, anywhere!
and it also goes back to the point of "what is everyone's definition of Beauty"? every person is different; some people like me and Mai Kee [sorry to always use you as an example, MK!] and Mirimark like the small, dainty femgirl look, like Fiat and First, Icey and Nut from my other thread today. Some like 'em tall and slim with no boobs; some like 'em dark-skinned while others like them white. MOST guys [based on my research and e-mails and reading this forum] like the types we will add next month; "true" shemales with big tits, big dicks, and if possible, lovely faces. Talisha and Natalie [both KC3 and Casa Natalie; this is going to get confusing soon] come to mind, as well as girls like Jiji, Ex, Noon, Areeya, Vicky, Cee and Anney from Obsessions. Others, although a small minority based on what I can tell, like post-op girls and we add 1 or 2 of those per month [but no more] to keep that small contigent happy.
Now, based on the true shemale types we add here sometime that the guys love, we would only be able to add about 15 girls per month. Maybe 20 but that would be stretching it, and Stogie has mentioned to me before that we should just go with 20 girls and keep the not-so-good-looking ones or the skinny runts with no tits off the site completely. That would surely piss off some people who would miss that type, and again who makes the call on the beauty angle? as the content editor here, is it really fair for me to leave certain girls off just because they aren't as hot as Noon or Linly or Chompoo or Areeya? maybe I would leave off a girl that some guys would really like, even if she is not my personal type.
so, I guess this should be a poll, but would you guys think we should just keep showing 25 girls per month with a few so-so ones mixed in now and then, or just add 15 girls who all would agree are stunning? My vote would be for the more the better, and if certain girls aren't your cup o' tea, simply pass on that gallery; with so many girls going up every month there are certainly enough to please everyone.
thoughts appreciated
His first comment was "man, these girls are stunning; too bad we have to mix them in with the average-looking girls we add to the site sometime" and we started talking about that. There is no question that some of the girls we add here are in the "10" catagory and some, to put it nicely, are not as hot-looking. Again, this goes back to what I was saying in another thread that not every girl we add here can be a perfect beauty, lest we only add 10 girls a month or so. adding 250+ girls a year, it is just not possible to find that many beautiful shemales, anywhere!
and it also goes back to the point of "what is everyone's definition of Beauty"? every person is different; some people like me and Mai Kee [sorry to always use you as an example, MK!] and Mirimark like the small, dainty femgirl look, like Fiat and First, Icey and Nut from my other thread today. Some like 'em tall and slim with no boobs; some like 'em dark-skinned while others like them white. MOST guys [based on my research and e-mails and reading this forum] like the types we will add next month; "true" shemales with big tits, big dicks, and if possible, lovely faces. Talisha and Natalie [both KC3 and Casa Natalie; this is going to get confusing soon] come to mind, as well as girls like Jiji, Ex, Noon, Areeya, Vicky, Cee and Anney from Obsessions. Others, although a small minority based on what I can tell, like post-op girls and we add 1 or 2 of those per month [but no more] to keep that small contigent happy.
Now, based on the true shemale types we add here sometime that the guys love, we would only be able to add about 15 girls per month. Maybe 20 but that would be stretching it, and Stogie has mentioned to me before that we should just go with 20 girls and keep the not-so-good-looking ones or the skinny runts with no tits off the site completely. That would surely piss off some people who would miss that type, and again who makes the call on the beauty angle? as the content editor here, is it really fair for me to leave certain girls off just because they aren't as hot as Noon or Linly or Chompoo or Areeya? maybe I would leave off a girl that some guys would really like, even if she is not my personal type.
so, I guess this should be a poll, but would you guys think we should just keep showing 25 girls per month with a few so-so ones mixed in now and then, or just add 15 girls who all would agree are stunning? My vote would be for the more the better, and if certain girls aren't your cup o' tea, simply pass on that gallery; with so many girls going up every month there are certainly enough to please everyone.
thoughts appreciated
Comment