Thanks jadeite for your comprehensive response to my post.
You seem to have covered everything & as I only represent one side of the debate, I was going to agree to disagree & leave it for the BMs to make up their own minds.
But I was a little troubled by a couple of your comments so I felt it necessary to clarify a couple of things.
Your first point on Buddhism is good, I agree entirely about it being a religion of tolerance. Where else does a son announce his intention to swap sex & he/she is accepted with love by the whole family?
There's Buddhism in action, wouldn't work like that anywhere else I can think of.
Buddhists may well wish to help each other but in the late 70's, early 80's, when a group of Buddhist monks were voted into a hung parliament, they held the balance of power & immediately set about closing down the sex trade.
I can't remember dates, I don't know their names but this is a matter of public record, the news of which swept the world.
Having witnessed the appalling behaviour of the ugly sex tourist first hand during my 2 month stay in 1976, I could not say I was surprised.
It is also a matter of public record that it didn't happen.
Deals were done, bribes were probably paid, but the simple fact was the economy couldn't afford it.
The best girls in the northern villages were selected & financed to go to Bangkok or Pattaya with the sole purpose of remitting money home - for the entire village in many cases.
How do I know?
I spoke to dozens of them.
But the monks didn't lose the fight, not entirely. The 18 year age limit was imposed, the major scene of the crime was effectively closed.
The reason I mentioned the thriving scene in Patpong with at least 30 bars, all opening out onto the street, was because on my return visit they were all, bar the few there today, gone.
I mean blocks of the best nightlife in the World just history. You asked Doug in your earlier reply to name just one business that replaced a bar,
walk the 3 blocks of Patpong & write down the names of the non-bar businesses & you will be off to a good start.
Admittedly there aren't many up-market restaurants but you did ask.
Some of the old names survived, except they had to relocate upstairs.
The reason I was told : "police don't want falang to see dancing girls".
KC3, Kings Corner, etc - I think their survival owes more to who owns them then any loophole in the legislation.
The same motivation still exists amongst Thai legislators today that saw the mass closure then. It is not a weak argument to remind everyone that if they did it then they can do it again.
The only logical reason to have enforced alcohol bans is to damage falang bar owners. Part of the grand plan to take back control of the nightlife business.
Then I have to remind myself This Is Thailand - where the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.
Next point - surviving the Royal mourning period.
Explain to me the business plan that allows any bar/club owner to prosper while his premises remain closed.
Even if they can open, it will be with all signs & most lights off, & as for go-go dancing or consuming booze,
I wasn't joking when I wrote that would be reason enough to kill someone for the show of disrespect.
Even if one had sufficient funds to ride it out, how do you keep your staff? It will be a very interesting time.
Nana, for sale or not? Everything is for sale at the right price but I do agree with jadeite that the current owners already own the best & cheapest investment they will ever have.
It is for that reason alone we should not be so quick to write off Nana.
But what if they are elderly & their oldest son has an MBA from Harvard & the Govt changes the legislation on bars?
A few "ifs" there, but something will happen one day & as stated, we will wake up to find it a pile of rubble.
Imagine the planning concessions the next generation of owners could wrest from the Govt if they proposed a redevelopment for the site.
"Not only do you get a brand new building, but you rid the city of this din of iniquity."
I will let Rossco confirm what was stated at the grand dinner put on by the Govt for 500 guests concerning the future of Pattaya.
The fact that it has been all said before should be more reason to understand the Govt's determination to follow through with their stated desire to "clean-up the place".
And many beerbars have already been swept away when another big development has been approved.
The old buildings lining Soi Yamoto & others like it are all ripe for the taking.
The officials are all aware they will have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to seize back all the clubs & bars they want during the official mourning period.
If 3 months won't be long enough, then they will make it 6 months.
Yes, I can hear everyone screaming now, but let's wait till we see what they do. And naturally, I do hope I am completely wrong.
Sorry about all that jadeite, I know you obliquely referred to me as to not having a clue, but while I don't reside like yourself,
as a frequent visitor to LOS with many local business associates I have known for years, I feel entitled to express my firmly held view.
You seem to have covered everything & as I only represent one side of the debate, I was going to agree to disagree & leave it for the BMs to make up their own minds.
But I was a little troubled by a couple of your comments so I felt it necessary to clarify a couple of things.
Your first point on Buddhism is good, I agree entirely about it being a religion of tolerance. Where else does a son announce his intention to swap sex & he/she is accepted with love by the whole family?
There's Buddhism in action, wouldn't work like that anywhere else I can think of.
Buddhists may well wish to help each other but in the late 70's, early 80's, when a group of Buddhist monks were voted into a hung parliament, they held the balance of power & immediately set about closing down the sex trade.
I can't remember dates, I don't know their names but this is a matter of public record, the news of which swept the world.
Having witnessed the appalling behaviour of the ugly sex tourist first hand during my 2 month stay in 1976, I could not say I was surprised.
It is also a matter of public record that it didn't happen.
Deals were done, bribes were probably paid, but the simple fact was the economy couldn't afford it.
The best girls in the northern villages were selected & financed to go to Bangkok or Pattaya with the sole purpose of remitting money home - for the entire village in many cases.
How do I know?
I spoke to dozens of them.
But the monks didn't lose the fight, not entirely. The 18 year age limit was imposed, the major scene of the crime was effectively closed.
The reason I mentioned the thriving scene in Patpong with at least 30 bars, all opening out onto the street, was because on my return visit they were all, bar the few there today, gone.
I mean blocks of the best nightlife in the World just history. You asked Doug in your earlier reply to name just one business that replaced a bar,
walk the 3 blocks of Patpong & write down the names of the non-bar businesses & you will be off to a good start.
Admittedly there aren't many up-market restaurants but you did ask.
Some of the old names survived, except they had to relocate upstairs.
The reason I was told : "police don't want falang to see dancing girls".
KC3, Kings Corner, etc - I think their survival owes more to who owns them then any loophole in the legislation.
The same motivation still exists amongst Thai legislators today that saw the mass closure then. It is not a weak argument to remind everyone that if they did it then they can do it again.
The only logical reason to have enforced alcohol bans is to damage falang bar owners. Part of the grand plan to take back control of the nightlife business.
Then I have to remind myself This Is Thailand - where the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.
Next point - surviving the Royal mourning period.
Explain to me the business plan that allows any bar/club owner to prosper while his premises remain closed.
Even if they can open, it will be with all signs & most lights off, & as for go-go dancing or consuming booze,
I wasn't joking when I wrote that would be reason enough to kill someone for the show of disrespect.
Even if one had sufficient funds to ride it out, how do you keep your staff? It will be a very interesting time.
Nana, for sale or not? Everything is for sale at the right price but I do agree with jadeite that the current owners already own the best & cheapest investment they will ever have.
It is for that reason alone we should not be so quick to write off Nana.
But what if they are elderly & their oldest son has an MBA from Harvard & the Govt changes the legislation on bars?
A few "ifs" there, but something will happen one day & as stated, we will wake up to find it a pile of rubble.
Imagine the planning concessions the next generation of owners could wrest from the Govt if they proposed a redevelopment for the site.
"Not only do you get a brand new building, but you rid the city of this din of iniquity."
I will let Rossco confirm what was stated at the grand dinner put on by the Govt for 500 guests concerning the future of Pattaya.
The fact that it has been all said before should be more reason to understand the Govt's determination to follow through with their stated desire to "clean-up the place".
And many beerbars have already been swept away when another big development has been approved.
The old buildings lining Soi Yamoto & others like it are all ripe for the taking.
The officials are all aware they will have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to seize back all the clubs & bars they want during the official mourning period.
If 3 months won't be long enough, then they will make it 6 months.
Yes, I can hear everyone screaming now, but let's wait till we see what they do. And naturally, I do hope I am completely wrong.
Sorry about all that jadeite, I know you obliquely referred to me as to not having a clue, but while I don't reside like yourself,
as a frequent visitor to LOS with many local business associates I have known for years, I feel entitled to express my firmly held view.
Comment